Skills & Competency Review Template

Skills review — David Lefevre (Site Engineer, Brussels)


Department
Infrastructure Projects
Review Period
Q1 2026
Manager
TLThomas Laurent
Status
Completed

📊 Competency assessment

CompetencyCategoryTargetCurrentGap
Structural analysis (EN 1992)Technical44None
BIM coordination (Revit + Navisworks)Technical32-1
Risk assessment methodologyFunctional33None
Stakeholder communicationBehavioural43-1

📋 Development plan

CompetencyActionMethodDeadline
BIM coordinationComplete Revit Advanced + Navisworks clash detection moduleExternal training31/03/2026
Stakeholder communicationLead client progress meetings on Lyon metro project (monthly)Project assignment30/06/2026

💬 Comments

Manager: David has strong technical foundations. BIM gap is a priority given our digital construction roadmap. Stakeholder communication will develop naturally through the Lyon metro client meetings.

Employee: Agreed on priorities. I have already registered for the Revit Advanced course starting 10 March.

Content continues in Elium...

Give managers and HR teams a structured format for assessing employee skills, identifying competency gaps, and planning development actions. This template captures current proficiency levels, target expectations, and specific actions to close the gap — so skills data is documented, comparable, and actionable across the organisation.

Try now in Elium

What is a skills and competency review?

A skills and competency review is a structured assessment that maps an employee’s current proficiency against the competencies required for their role. It identifies strengths, gaps, and development priorities so the organisation can invest in targeted training rather than generic programmes.

Unlike annual performance reviews that focus on goals and outputs, a skills review focuses on knowledge and capability. It asks: does this person have the technical, functional, and behavioural competencies their role requires? Where are the gaps, and what is the plan to close them? Without a standardised template, skills assessments vary by manager — making it impossible to compare across teams, identify systemic gaps, or plan workforce development at scale.

Who should use this template?

This template is for teams responsible for workforce capability and development:

  • HR Business Partners — run skills assessments across departments and identify organisation-wide competency gaps
  • Line Managers — assess direct reports against role-specific competencies and agree on development actions
  • Learning and Development Teams — use aggregated skills data to design training programmes that address real gaps
  • Knowledge Managers — connect skills gaps to knowledge assets so employees access the right learning content

What’s included in this template?

The template has two parts: structured metadata fields and the review body.

Metadata fields classify each review:

  • Employee name and role
  • Department and reporting manager
  • Review period (e.g. Q1 2026)
  • Review status (scheduled, in progress, completed)

Review body documents the assessment:

  • Role competency framework — list of required competencies grouped by category (technical, functional, behavioural) with target proficiency level
  • Current assessment — rated proficiency for each competency with evidence or examples
  • Gap analysis — summary of competencies where current level falls below target
  • Development plan — specific actions to close each gap, with owner, method (training, mentoring, project assignment), and timeline
  • Manager and employee comments — space for both parties to add context and agree on priorities

How to create and customise this template in Elium

  1. Open the Template Builder — Go to your profile menu and select the Template Builder tab, or click “+ Create” and choose “Create a new template”.
  2. Set the scope — Choose an icon, enable the template, and decide whether it applies platform-wide or to specific spaces (e.g. HR or individual departments).
  3. Add structured fields — Click “Field” to add metadata: text fields for employee name and role, a tag field for department, a user field for reporting manager, a tag field for review period, and a tag field for status (pre-populate with “Scheduled”, “In Progress”, “Completed”). Mark employee name and review period as mandatory.
  4. Build the review structure — Use the “+” button to add content blocks: a table block for the competency framework (columns: competency, category, target level, current level, gap), a text block for gap analysis, a table block for the development plan (columns: competency, action, method, owner, deadline), and text blocks for manager and employee comments.
  5. Preview and save — Review the template layout, then save. Managers can now select it when running skills reviews, and you can apply it to existing content in bulk.

How AI helps you create and use this template

Capture faster. Tell Elium’s AI the role title and department. It suggests a competency framework based on similar roles already documented in your knowledge base — so the manager adjusts rather than building from scratch.

Retrieve smarter. An L&D manager asks Elium’s AI: “Which technical competencies have the widest gaps across our engineering teams?” The AI aggregates data from completed reviews and surfaces the most common shortfalls — so training investment targets the areas with the greatest need.

Why teams use Elium for skills management

Skills data is only useful when it is current, consistent, and connected to action. When reviews live in spreadsheets emailed between managers and HR, the data fragments and goes stale. Elium keeps skills knowledge centralised: structured templates ensure every review follows the same framework, search connects skills gaps to relevant training content, and version history tracks how competencies develop over time.

Bouygues Construction — 53,500 employees across 80 countries — uses Elium to centralise people and operational knowledge. Skills documentation, training materials, and best practices are accessible across the organisation, supporting workforce development at scale.

Frequently asked questions

A skills and competency review assesses an employee’s current proficiency against the competencies their role requires. It identifies strengths and gaps so development efforts are targeted rather than generic. Without structured reviews, skills data is invisible — managers cannot compare across teams, and the organisation cannot plan workforce development with evidence.
A complete skills review includes employee and role metadata, a competency framework listing required skills with target levels, current proficiency ratings with evidence, a gap analysis highlighting shortfalls, and a development plan with specific actions, methods, owners, and deadlines. Comments from both manager and employee ensure alignment.
Structured skills reviews reveal competency gaps before they cause problems. They enable targeted training investment rather than generic programmes. They support succession planning by identifying employees ready for progression. They create a documented skills baseline that HR can aggregate across teams to identify systemic gaps.
Start with a clear competency framework for the role — typically five to ten competencies grouped by category. Use a consistent rating scale with defined levels. Rate each competency with evidence, not opinion. Focus the development plan on the two or three highest-priority gaps with specific actions and deadlines. Review progress quarterly.
A skills review assesses capability — what an employee can do and where their knowledge gaps are. A performance review assesses output — whether an employee met their goals and delivered results. Skills reviews inform development; performance reviews inform reward and recognition. Both are valuable, but they answer different questions.

Related reading: Read more on our blog